ORACLE derives the population that actually decides your question, instantiates
named delegates with histories and priors, lets them argue over multiple rounds, and returns a
verdict with every claim traceable to who said it. Then you interrogate it — question the
analyst, interview any delegate, inject new facts and re-run the population.
the crowd you can cross-examine_
roundsdelegates/segment
▤ SYSTEM
—
simulations
—
delegates instantiated
—
contributions
—
model
01
Frame
Find the assumption hidden in your question
02
Population
Derive the segments that actually decide it
03
Simulate
Named delegates argue, follow, and change their minds
04
Verdict
Every claim cited to a post number
05
Interrogate
Cross-examine it, then inject facts and branch
▤ HISTORY DATABASE
No simulations yet.
POPULATION GRAPH
PLAY replays the real simulation round by round · fill = stance · ring = segment · yellow flash = a delegate actually changed their mind that round